Expert Tips on Wildlife & Nature Photography
Court is an avid nature and wildlife photographer and naturalist Expedition Leader for Natural Habitat Adventures. His background in wildlife and conservation biology led him to pursue a joint Ph.D. in ecotourism and entomology. As Editor in Chief of The Natural Photographer, he is eager to share his photography knowledge and creative guidance with readers through comprehensive tutorials and blog posts. You may view more of his photography at www.courtwhelan.com
2 Comments
John
July 29, 2024 at 3:06 pm
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
August 2, 2024 at 11:11 am
I think I hit you with this question previously but didn’t get a response.
Given the new restrictions in Svalbard (maintain 500 yards distance from polar bears) is the Sony 600mm f/4 with a 1.4 TC (f/5.6) going to be significantly better than the Sony 200-600 f/5.6-6.3 with the TC (f/9 @ 600mm)? I think I can buy, and then sell, the 600 and spend no more than what would be the rental cost for two weeks.
Hi John, in short, yep, the 600mm f/4 will be better. This is primarily because of the higher quality glass which means that small objects in the scene will be sharper and you’ll have WAY more cropping ability. The 200-600 is the ultimate in versatility, but if you know you are going to be photographing to crop later, go for the highest quality (and fast shutter speed with low ISO) possible. Best of luck out there!