Expert Tips on Wildlife & Nature Photography
Court is an avid nature and wildlife photographer and naturalist Expedition Leader for Natural Habitat Adventures. His background in wildlife and conservation biology led him to pursue a joint Ph.D. in ecotourism and entomology. As Editor in Chief of The Natural Photographer, he is eager to share his photography knowledge and creative guidance with readers through comprehensive tutorials and blog posts. You may view more of his photography at www.courtwhelan.com
2 Comments
Gina Maschio
June 1, 2023 at 8:36 am
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
June 2, 2023 at 8:48 am
Thanks for all these tips through these blog posts! I’ve been going through some of the older ones as well to help prepare for some upcoming trips (Costa Rica, India, Africa/Madagascar/East Africa, and eventually Antarctica). All these trips will be done through Nat Hab, so I’m fairly confident that my guides will assist in getting us relatively close enough to get whatever shot I desire and assist with camera techniques if not.
Right now I have the budget to invest in one “nice” lens (have been using my kit lenses for years now and while they have served me well, these once in a lifetime trips warrant an upgrade) for my Nikon D500. I’ve been debating between the new 70-200 2.8 and 80-400 4.5-5.6 (I’ll be renting both in a couple weeks, but am already expecting to be overly impressed with the photos I get simply because either is a huge upgrade from my DX glass). Given these planned ventures, that 2.8 is a huge appeal (gorilla treks, rainforests, early/late drives) but the reach of the 400, particularly on my camera body is also key. I’d be giving up weather sealing to get that though (which is also major points to the 70-200 given the less than forgiving environments I’ll be in). So now it’s coming to trying to figure out if that effective 300mm-ish of the shorter lens would be “enough” for my non NatGeo level photographs. I know both are a staple in most photographers kit, so looking for any guidance on which one this hobbyist should invest in(:
Hi Gina, two great lenses indeed! Honestly, although the 70-200 is fantastic, and with the 1.5x crop factor you’ll be at 300mm effectively, I’m just afraid that isn’t quite enough for the slew of trips you have coming up (and awesome slew it is!). Whenever I am in range and can use the 70-200, that’s what I’ll be using. However, there are definitely times that you’ll want more. The 80-400 is a fantastic lens and in many ways is a better one-stop-shop lens.
If it’s at all possible…budget-wise as well as space wise, I’d entertain the 70-200 and then getting Nikon’s lower priced 200-500. I know it’s just more gear and more money, but that combo would be spectacular.
If instead you’re really looking for one single lens to carry you through all these adventures and more, I’d go for the 80-400. It’s a sensational range and a very high quality lens.
Hope this helps!