Expert Tips on Wildlife & Nature Photography
Court is an avid nature and wildlife photographer and naturalist Expedition Leader for Natural Habitat Adventures. His background in wildlife and conservation biology led him to pursue a joint Ph.D. in ecotourism and entomology. As Editor in Chief of The Natural Photographer, he is eager to share his photography knowledge and creative guidance with readers through comprehensive tutorials and blog posts. You may view more of his photography at www.courtwhelan.com
10 Comments
Charlie Stricklin
June 29, 2023 at 8:35 am
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
July 7, 2023 at 9:55 am
Charlie Stricklin
July 13, 2023 at 11:32 am
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
July 14, 2023 at 11:23 am
Jon T
February 28, 2024 at 4:56 pm
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
March 13, 2024 at 6:27 am
Kathy Morhous
March 17, 2024 at 8:09 pm
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
March 28, 2024 at 9:32 am
Ellen Campbell
April 4, 2024 at 11:05 am
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
May 1, 2024 at 12:23 pm
I’m a very amateur photographer. I have a Canon T7 with a Tamron 150-600 mm F5-6.3, a 75-300mm 1:4-5:6 Canon, and a 18-55 mm 1:3-5.6 Canon. What should I take? I have a tripod and a monopod. I also have a GoPro+ for underwater.
I’m traveling on the Celebrity Flora for a 7 day cruise of the Outer Loop in early September around the Galapagos .
Thank you for your feedback.
Charlie Stricklin
Charleston, SC
great question, Charlie! The 18-55mm is a must-bring. As is the GoPro. However, you could choose between the 150-600 and 75-300 if you’re trying to pack light. Frankly, there is a merit to bringing both, just in case you want to bring one on one day, and the other the next day. However, I would recommend choosing between the two based on image quality. You won’t need much more than the 300mm to get the shots you want, but if you feel the 150-600 is a sharper, better lens, then I’d bring that one. However, the 75-300 will be more versatile, as you’ll be able to get good landscape shots at 75 and 100mm, whereas you will probably have to change lenses to the 18-55 for most landscape shots if you only bring the 150-600. Hope this helps! (and bring both telephoto lenses if you can, and you can just decide each day which to carry :))
A tripod would be needed for night sky shots in the Galapagos right?
well, sorta. The problem is that most of the time you are on a boat at night, and even the slightest movement of the boat will blur long exposures. However, you might get some great night photos at Tortoise Camp if you are going on a Nat Hab Galapagos trip!
Hi…. nice article….heading to Galapagos in december and very excited. just a clarification…. bokeh is not the out of focus area…”blurred background” …..thats depth of field. Bokeh is the quality of the out of focus area.
yes yes, great clarification! Bokeh refers to the quality of that out of focus area. Thanks for submitting!
I plan to bring my 16-35, my 24-70, rent the 100-200 f2.8 gm11, but can’t decide whether or not to bring my 200-600 or the Tamron 50-400. I also have a 1.4x teleconverter… I’ve been wanting to try the 100-200 for awhile. I love my 200-600, but would need to use a monopod if I was carrying it all day. Ugh Any thoughts? I’m going with Wildside Photo tours.
Hi Kathy, great question! If the decision is between the 100-200 vs. the 200-600, I’d say the 100-200 f/2.8. Sure, you will absolutely use the extended range of the 200-600, and it’s really fun to zoom in and fill the frame with wildlife. However, for so many shots you’ll be able to do that with the 200mm! Thus, the better quality, better bokeh, and lighter load all tilt the balance in favor of the 100-200. However, usually you aren’t restricted too much to weight and space for camera gear on photo trips, so you could bring the 200-600 with you, but just take it out on days you feel like it! The 100-200 will be your workhorse, along with the 24-70 :).
Love your article. I too am traveling on the Celebrity Flora for a 7 day cruise of the Outer Loop in a few weeks and I am taking a Canon R7 with the RF 70-200 2.8 and an R6 with the 24-105 4.0. I am wondering after reading your article should I use (as a walk around lens on the islands) the R6 with the 70-200 or the R7 with the 70-200 which will give me the extra 1.6 advantage at 320 mm? Your thoughts? Thanks !
hmmm, great question, Ellen! If it were me, I’d go for the full frame, as it’s inherently higher quality. I’d also like to have the extra width to my shots at 24mm without the crop factor. Yes, it’d be nice to have a 300 or 320mm equivalent, but I think you can probably crop your photos if needed but I’d prefer the higher quality shots to begin with :).