Expert Tips on Wildlife & Nature Photography
Court is an avid nature and wildlife photographer and naturalist Expedition Leader for Natural Habitat Adventures. His background in wildlife and conservation biology led him to pursue a joint Ph.D. in ecotourism and entomology. As Editor in Chief of The Natural Photographer, he is eager to share his photography knowledge and creative guidance with readers through comprehensive tutorials and blog posts. You may view more of his photography at www.courtwhelan.com
4 Comments
Arthur Leyenberger
April 24, 2022 at 10:21 am
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
April 25, 2022 at 2:39 pm
Will
February 19, 2023 at 2:09 pm
Court Whelan, Ph.D.
February 21, 2023 at 12:47 pm
Interesting article, Court. I’ve enjoyed your other articles as well.
For the current range of Olympus MFT lenses, what would you recommend? I have a Yellowstone trip with NatHab coming up in September and I’m thinking my 40-150mm (80-300 full frame equivalent) with the 1.4x converter should get me in the vicinity of focal length you describe. Since the lens is f/2.8, even the 2.0x converter would yield a nice f/5.6 at 600mm equivalent.
Any other Oympus lens thoughts?
Thanks
…..Art
hi Art, Yes! That 40-150 f/2.8 is a DREAM lens. So good in so many ways. However, with the big, wide open landscapes of Yellowstone you’ll definitely want some more telephoto if possible. So yep, a 1.4 or 2.0 converter would be fantastic in this case. The thing with Yellowstone is that you almost never have “enough” telephoto, as there is always something “just a little bit further.” Thus, I think so much of photographing Yellowstone best is to go with what you’ve got, have great lenses capable of good sharpness (the 40-150 is a prime example) and concentrate on what you can take photos of. That being said, if you are interested in a major investment, I’ve heard wonderful things about the Olympus 150-400mm. But it is indeed a significant investment.
I just finished reading your article regarding lens selection. Super piece. My question –
I will be attending a photo shoot in November 2023 to capture wolves, bison, and elk. The primary lens I wish to take along include 24-120mm f/4, 70-300mm f/4.5, and 200-500mm f/5.6. I was also exploring a 10-24mm f/3.5 for night shooting. Am I carrying too much?
I will also carry my D750 and a Z7 II.
Thanks,
Will
hi Will, this sounds like a wonderful kit. No, not to much at all :). The 10-24mm is your x-factor lens, in that you don’t totally need it, but it could give you some of your most favorite shots of the trip. The other three lenses are quite important. The only one I could see you not using much is the 70-300, only because you’re relatively covered by your 24-120 and 200-500. That 120-200 gap isn’t super important and I think you’ll probably prefer having ready access to your 200-500 most of the time. Hope this helps!